Chiang Mai Journal of Science

Print ISSN: 0125-2526 | eISSN : 2465-3845

1,647

Articles

Q3 0.80

Impact Factor

Q3 1.3

CiteScore

7 days

Avg. First Decision

Outline

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
REFERENCES

Figures and Tables

Figure 1. Phylogenetic analyses of Omphalotus using ITS sequence data. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (BS) equal to or greater than 65% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) equal to or greater than 0.90 are given at the nodes. Mycetinis scorodonius (CBS:251.48 and TFB4749) and M. opacus (TFBT11499) were added as the roots of the tree. The newly obtained sequences are in red, and type strains are indicated in superscript ‘T’.
Figure 2. Omphalotus flagelliformis. Basidiomata in natural habitats GMB-W1464 (A) and GMB-W1214 (B), Close-up mature basidioma GMB-W1215 (C1), Colony on PDA after seven days GMBCC1149 (D), Bioluminescence in basidioma and cultures under dark conditions (C2, D2). Scale bars: A–E: 10 µm.
Figure 3. Macroscopic characteristics of Omphalotus flagelliformis (GMB-W1214). Basidiospores (A), Basidia and basidioles (B), Cheilocystidia (C), Pileipellis (D), and Stipitipellis and caulocystidia (E). Scale bars: A–E: 10 µm.