Chiang Mai Journal of Science

Print ISSN: 0125-2526 | eISSN : 2465-3845

1,647
Articles
Q3 0.80
Impact Factor
Q3 1.3
CiteScore
7 days
Avg. First Decision

Classification Techniques for Control Chart Pattern Recognition: A Case of Metal Frame for Actuator Production

Wimalin Laosiritaworn*, Tunchanit Bunjongjit
* Author for corresponding; e-mail address: wimalin@hotmail.com
Volume: Vol.40 No.4 (OCTOBER 2013)
Research Article
DOI:
Received: -, Revised: -, Accepted: -, Published: -

Citation: Laosiritaworn W. and Bunjongjit T., Classification Techniques for Control Chart Pattern Recognition: A Case of Metal Frame for Actuator Production, Chiang Mai Journal of Science, 2013; 40(4): 701-712.

Abstract

Statistical process control (SPC) plays a significant role in hard-disk drive manufacturing as there is a crucial need to constantly improve of productivity. Control chart is one of the SPC tools that have been widely implemented to identify whether nonrandom pattern caused by assignable cause exists in the production process.  Decision rules are usually used for detecting nonrandom patterns on control chart. However, recent research has shown that these rules had tendency of producing false alarm. This is a problem occurred in the case study company, who is a manufacturer of metal frame for actuator. The company is adopting technologically advanced equipment for its quality assurance system and computer software for data analysis and control chart. Currently, the company use decision rules for detecting nonrandom patterns on control chart – for example, if 6 or more consecutive data inputs found to be in an increasing or decreasing order, these data contain trend pattern. In attempt to improve the accuracy of data analysis, this research investigated the application of 3 classification techniques, namely neural network, k-nearest neighbor and rule induction, in discretion of nonrandom patterns. By considering the control charts of 3 different product lines, 3 types of nonrandom patterns, which are Trend, Cycle and Shift, are to be observed. Based on the real data inputs, the percentage of accuracy in error detection by each technique of each product line is compared. It is found the accuracy of k-nearest neighbor is highest with the percentage of correctly prediction between 96.99 – 98.7%.

Keywords: Control Chart, Pattern Recognition, Neural Network, K-Nearest Neighbor, Rule Induction

Related Articles

Development of Electrochemical Method for Cantonese Herbal Tea Authentic Identification
page: 1195 - 1203

Xu Peng, Yuting Xu, Qinghua Liu, Weihong Wu, Qinwei Zhou and Li Fu*

Vol.47 No.6 (November 2020)
Research Article View: 1,328 Download: 9,027
Polyaniline/wheat Husk Ash Nanocomposite Preparation and Modeling Its Removal Activity with an Artificial Neural Network
page: 533 - 543

Fatemeh Ghanbary* [a] and Ahmed Jafarian [b]

Vol.44 No.2 (April 2017)
Research Article View: 922 Download: 236
Improved Backpropagation Model for Classification of Profitability Analysis Data : A Study on Malaysian Market
page: 35 - 41

Siti Mariyam Hj. Shamsuddin* [a], Saiful Hafizah Hj. Jaaman [b], Noriza Majid [b] and Noriszura Ismail [b] and Noriszura I

Vol.29 No.1 (APRIL 2002)
Research Article View: 1,012 Download: 291
Neural Network Application on Knowledge Acquisition for Adaptive Hypermedia Learning
page: 65 - 70

Paridah Samsuri, Nor Bahiah Hj. Ahmad, Norazah Yusof, Siti Zaiton Mohd. Hashim, Siti Mariyam Hj.

Vol.28 No.1 (JUNE 2001)
Opinion View: 958 Download: 345
Outline
Figures