Chiang Mai Journal of Science

Print ISSN: 0125-2526 | eISSN : 2465-3845

1,647
Articles
Q3 0.80
Impact Factor
Q3 1.3
CiteScore
7 days
Avg. First Decision

Evaluation of In Vivo Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load of MARES P10 Whey Protein Beverage

Wason Parklak, Sakaewan Ounjaijean and Kongsak Boonyapranai
* Author for corresponding; e-mail address: kongsak.b@cmu.ac.th
Volume: Vol.51 No.6 (November 2024)
Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12982/CMJS.2024.102
Received: 20 August 2024, Revised: 13 October 2024, Accepted: 17 October 2024, Published: 29 November 2024

Citation: Parklak W., Ounjaijean S. and Boonyapranai K., Evaluation of in vivo glycemic index and glycemic load of MARES P10 whey protein beverage, Chiang Mai Journal of Science, 2024; 51(6): e2024102. DOI 10.12982/CMJS.2024.102.

Abstract

     The glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are important measures to assess the impact of foods and beverages on postprandial blood glucose levels. Accurate assessment of glycemic response ensures that products meet the nutritional needs of consumers who want an effective supplement without causing a spike in blood sugar levels. Consequently, the GI and GL of MARES P10, a whey protein beverage, are the objective of this study. The GI value of MARES P10 was determined in 10 healthy adults with an equal proportion of males and females. The blood glucose levels of participants were monitored for the subsequent two hours, and both the reference food (glucose solution) and MARES P10 contained 50 g of available carbohydrates. After ingesting MARES P10, participants had significantly lower blood glucose levels than after oral glucose solution test at 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes (p<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.039, respectively). The incremental area under the glycemic response curve at 120 minutes was also significantly lower than that of the oral glucose solution test (1,589.60 ± 217.14 and 4,725.60 ± 354.12 mg × min/dL, respectively, p<0.001). The GI and GL of MARES P10 were analyzed, and the mean ± SEM values were 34.56 ± 4.81 and 13.91 ± 1.94, respectively. These findings suggest that MARES P10 has a low GI and a medium GL, making it a suitable supplement for individuals seeking to manage blood sugar levels and maintain sustained energy.

Keywords: glycemic index, glycemic load, whey protein, MARES P10

Related Articles

Effect of Die Temperature and Porang (Amorphophallus mulleri B.) Flour on the Physicochemical Properties, Nutritional Value, Estimated Glycemic Index, and Sensory Evaluation of Brown Rice Snack by a Collet Extruder
DOI: 10.12982/CMJS.2025.003.

Cindytia Selvina Bernas, Sagar Pandappa Kalahal, Domas Galih Patria and Jenshinn Lin

Vol.52 No.1 (January 2025)
Research Article View: 1,633 Download: 375
Measurement of Glycemic Index: A High-Protein Peptide-Based Enteral Formula
DOI: 10.12982/CMJS.2024.057.

Wason Parklak, Amaraporn Rerkasem, Suwinai Sangyo, Sasinat Pongtam, Supawan Buranapin and Kittipan Rerkasem

Vol.51 No.4 (July 2024)
Research Article View: 1,459 Download: 844
The Effect of Whey Protein Concentrate Addition on the Gel Properties of Potato Starch and the Quality of Vermicelli
DOI: 10.12982/CMJS.2024.042.

Yan Li, Shuxing Chen, Peng Fei and Qianwen Li

Vol.51 No.3 (May 2024)
Research Article View: 773 Download: 523
Effect of Microwave and Infrared Heating Process on Increasing Resistant Starch type 3 and Reducing Glycemic Index in RD 43 Rice
DOI: 10.12982/CMJS.2022.040.

Nattarat Techanet, Arthitaya Kawee-ai, Natcha Laokuldilok and Niramon Utama-ang

Vol.49 No.2 (March 2022)
Research Article View: 2,028 Download: 1,360
Scavenging Activity of Whey Protein Hydrolysates in HaCaT Cells
page: 907 - 917

Vititda Awaiwanont, Angkana Tantituvanont, Waraporn Suwakul, Kulwara Meksawan

Vol.42 No.4 (OCTOBER 2015)
Research Article View: 905 Download: 309
Outline
Figures