Chiang Mai Journal of Science

Print ISSN: 0125-2526 | eISSN : 2465-3845

1,647
Articles
Q3 0.80
Impact Factor
Q3 1.3
CiteScore
7 days
Avg. First Decision

Biogas production from single digestion of Napier grass hydrolysate and co-digestion of solid fraction of microwave acid pretreated Napier grass with swine manure

Prawit Kongjan, Alissara Reungsang, Naphatsarnan Phasukaratchai, Sureewan Sittijunda*
* Author for corresponding; e-mail address: sureewan.sit@mahidol.ac.th
Volume: Vol.46 No.4 (July 2019)
Research Article
DOI:
Received: 16 October 2018, Revised: -, Accepted: 21 March 2019, Published: -

Citation: Kongjan P., Reungsang A., Phasukaratchai N. and Sittijunda S., Biogas production from single digestion of Napier grass hydrolysate and co-digestion of solid fraction of microwave acid pretreated Napier grass with swine manure, Chiang Mai Journal of Science, 2019; 46(4): 639-652.

Abstract

Biogas was obtained from the hydrolysate and solid fraction of microwave acid pretreated Napier grass by anaerobic mixed cultures. Factors influencing methane production including initial pH, inoculum concentration, and carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N ratio) were investigated. For the hydrolysate of Napier grass, maximum methane production (MP) and methane production rate (MPR) of 621.31 mL-CH4/L and 0.72 mL‑CH4/L h were obtained at initial pH of 8 and inoculum concentration of 15 g-VSS/L. Using the solid fraction of pretreated Napier grass co-digested with swine manure, maximum MP and MPR of 630.05 mL-CH4/L and 0.74 mL‑CH4/L h were obtained at C/N ratio of 21.03. Main methanogenic bacteria found in the hydrolysate and solid fraction fermentation of pretreated Napier grass co-digested with swine manure were Methanosarcina sp. Methanoregula sp. Methanospirillum sp. Methanocullues sp. and Methanothrix sp. Overall energy production from Napier grass hydrolysate and the solid fraction of pretreated Napier grass co-digested with swine manure was 7.99 kJ/g-VSadded.

Keywords: methane, anaerobic co-digestion, agricultural residues, energy production, C/N ratio

Related Articles

Bacterial Cellulose Production by Komagataeibacter nataicola TISTR 2661 by Agro-waste as a Carbon Source
page: 16 - 27

Churairat Moukamnerd, Keeratiya Ounmuang, Natthakan Konboa and Chayatip Insomphun

Vol.47 No.1 (January 2020)
Research Article View: 1,793 Download: 709
Isolation of a High Potential Thermotolerant Strain of Zymomonas mobilis for Ethanol Production at High Temperature Using Ethyl Methane Sulfonate Mutagenesis
page: 207 - 218

Jatupat Samappito, Preekamol Klanrit, Sudarat Thanonkeo, Mamoru Yamada and Pornthap Thanonkeo

Vol.46 No.2 (March 2019)
Research Article View: 885 Download: 293
Effects of Agricultural Residues as Carriers for Bio-fertilizer Production to Promote Tomato Growth in Saline Soil
page: 1699 - 1712

Pornrapee Sarin and Nuntavun Riddech

Vol.45 No.4 (July 2018)
Research Article View: 1,028 Download: 646
A Complete System for Renewable Utilization of Cassava to Biohydrogen Coupled with Biomethane as Zero-Waste Management
page: 1214 - 1224

Wilawan Channarong, Mongkol Ngamjarearnwong, Churapa Teerapatsakul and Lerluck Chitradon*

Vol.45 No.3 (May 2018)
Research Article View: 1,040 Download: 288
Green Synthesis of Bis(indolyl)methanes Catalysed by Salicylic Acid
page: 413 - 420

Hoda Banari, Hamzeh Kiyani and Alireza Pourali

Vol.45 No.1 (January 2018)
Research Article View: 904 Download: 481
Optimization of Treatment and Energetic Valorization of Chicken Droppings by Anaerobic Digestion
page: 1347 - 1355

Elasri Ouahid and Afilal mohamed Elamin

Vol.44 No.4 (October 2017)
Research Article View: 938 Download: 289
Methane production from acidic effluent obtained from hydrogen fermentation process of food waste using continuous stirred tank reactor
page: 578 - 587

Chakkrit Sreela-or, Sureewan Sittijunda, Alissara Reungsang

Vol.42 No.3 (JULY 2015)
Research Article View: 865 Download: 266
Outline
Figures