Chiang Mai Journal of Science

Print ISSN: 0125-2526 | eISSN : 2465-3845

1,647
Articles
Q3 0.80
Impact Factor
Q3 1.3
CiteScore
7 days
Avg. First Decision

Seasonal Variation and Sources Estimation of PM2.5-Bound PAHs from the Ambient Air of Chiang Mai City: An All-year-round Study in 2017

Sawaeng Kawichai, Tippawan Prapamontol, Somporn Chantara, Tinakorn Kanyanee, Wan Wiriya and Yan - Lin Zhang
* Author for corresponding; e-mail address: tprapamontol@gmail.com; tippawan.prapamontol@cmu.ac.th; dryanlinzhang@outlook.com
Volume: Vol.47 No.5 (September 2020)
Research Article
DOI:
Received: 13 March 2020, Revised: 6 May 2020, Accepted: 22 May 2020, Published: -

Citation: Kawichai S., Prapamontol T., Chantara S., Kanyanee T., Wiriya W. and Zhang Y.-.L., Seasonal Variation and Sources Estimation of PM2.5-Bound PAHs from the Ambient Air of Chiang Mai City: An All-year-round Study in 2017, Chiang Mai Journal of Science, 2020; 47(5): 958-972.

Abstract

 This study investigated PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentration to estimate sources of air pollution in Chiang Mai City, Thailand. In this study, the ambient PM2.5 samples were collected from January to December 2017 in Chiang Mai City (18° 47′ N, 98° 57′ E). Sixteen PAHs that have been designated as high priority by the US EPA were analyzed using a gas chromatograph (Model 7890A, Agilent) equipped with a mass spectrometer detector (Model 5975C). The PM2.5 concentrations could be classified into two periods by using active fire data (or so-called number of hotspots) detected by Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, a type of remote satellite sensing imaging. The first period took place from January to May, as a result of high biomass burning (HBB; n=62) and the second period occurred from June to December due to low biomass burning (LBB; n = 58). In both periods there was a significant difference between the 24-hour mean concentrations of PM2.5 ranging from 6.07 - 79.9 μg/m3 with a mean±SD of 35.8±16.3 μg/m3 for the HBB period and 7.71 - 53.4 μg/m3 with a mean±SD of 24.6±10.4 μg/m3 for the LBB period. Meanwhile, the mean concentrations of the 16 PAHs in the HBB period were significantly higher than those in the LBB period (p<0.01). The mean concentration of total PAHs in the HBB period was 9.22±3.11 ng/m3 as compared to 3.51±1.85 ng/m3 in the LBB period. The mean concentration of tPAHs in the HBB period was significantly higher than those in the LBB period (p<0.01). Molecular diagnostic ratios and principle component analysis of individual detected PAHs were used to characterize and identify their possible sources. The results indicated that biomass burning was the primary source of PAHs in the HBB period while fuel combustion and biomass burning were the sources in the LBB period. The present study results therefore suggest that a year-round study was able to estimate the sources of PM2.5-bound PAHs from the ambient air of Chiang Mai City.

Keywords: air pollution, PM2.5, PAHs, biomass burning

Related Articles

Air Quality Characteristics and Their Natural and Socioeconomic Drivers in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Economic Zone, Northern China
DOI: 10.12982/CMJS.2022.097.

Xiaoxue Zhang, Shuang Li and Chengcheng Xia

Vol.49 No.6 (November 2022)
Research Article View: 2,188 Download: 635
The Numerical Visualization of Air Pollution Propagation from a Single Generator to an Observed Area
page: 1430 - 1443

Udomsak Rakwongwan, Arnon Archankul, Sanae Rujivan and Perter Bastian

Vol.48 No.5 (September 2021)
Research Article View: 1,626 Download: 426
Vector Autoregressive Model: A Multivariate Time Series to Forecast the Ground Level Ozone (O3) Concentration in Malaysia
page: 1297 - 1309

Ahmad Fauzi Raffee, Hazrul Abdul Hamid*, Siti Nazahiyah Rahmat and Muhammad Ismail Jaffar

Vol.47 No.6 (November 2020)
Research Article View: 1,086 Download: 419
Observations of Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) in Northern Thailand
page: 767 - 776

Thitikorn Chanyatham*, Pakdee Chantraket and Nuenghatai Tantiplubthong

Vol.43 No.4 (JULY 2016)
Research Article View: 1,429 Download: 367
Phenanthrene Biodegradation by Pseudomonas sp. CH3 Isolated from Oil-contaminated Soil
page: 850 - 856

Chetsada Pothiratana, Thanabhorn Jitthanasuwan, Jirayut Ratchawong and Surachai Thac

Vol.42 No.4 (OCTOBER 2015)
Research Article View: 918 Download: 320
Efficiency of a Tailor Made NO2 Passive Sampler and Correlations of NO2, PM10 and PM10 - bound NO3- in Urban Air of Chiang Mai (Thailand)
page: 386 - 400

Chanakarn Khamkaew [a] and Somporn Chantara*[a,b]

Vol.40 No.3 (JULY 2013)
Research Article View: 1,035 Download: 299
Indoor and Outdoor Levels of PM2.5 from Selected Residential and Workplace Buildings in Chiang Mai
page: 219 - 226

Narongpan Chunram, Usanee Vinitketkumnuen, Richard L. Deming, and Somporn Chantara

Vol.34 No.2 (MAY 2007)
Research Article View: 916 Download: 401
Chemical Analysis of Airborne Particulates for Air Pollutants in Chiang Mai and Lamphun Provinces, Thailand
page: 123 - 135

Somporn Chantara, Sunanta Wangkarn, Urai Tengcharoenkul, Walaya Sangchan and Mongkon Rayanakorn

Vol.36 No.2 (MAY 2009)
Short Communication View: 996 Download: 270
Mango Tree Bark as Bioindicator for Air Pollution Monitoring in Chiang Mai City
page: 183 - 188

Palee Subsri* and Wanaruk Saipunkaew

Vol.29 No.3 (DECEMBER 2002)
Research Article View: 996 Download: 199
Outline
Figures