Journal Volumes


Visitors
ALL : 882,624
TODAY : 1,131
ONLINE : 22



















  JOURNAL DETAIL



Comparison Between Linear and Non-linear Variable Selection Methods with Applications to Spectroscopic(UV-Vis/NIR) Data


Paper Type 
Contributed Paper
Title 
Comparison Between Linear and Non-linear Variable Selection Methods with Applications to Spectroscopic(UV-Vis/NIR) Data
Author 
Chanida Krongchai, Sakunna Wongsaipun, Sujitra Funsueb, Parichat Theanjumpol, Jaroon Jakmunee and Sila Kittiwachana
Email 
silacmu@gmail.com
Abstract:

 Variable selection aims to identify important parameters in relation to predicted responses.

Selection outcomes of the important variables could be different depending on the methods used. In
this research, the important variables identified using linear and non-linear variable selection methods
based on partial least squares-variable important in prediction (PLS-VIP) and self organizing mapdiscrimination
index (SOM-DI) were compared. Two datasets, near-infrared (NIR) spectra of adulterated
Thai Jasmine rice and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectra of food colorant mixtures were used for
the demonstration. The advantages and disadvantages for the use of the different algorithms were
compared and discussed. For the NIR data, the calibration model using supervised self organizing map
(SSOM) offered better prediction results and the SOM-DI variable selection method identified the
spectral changes in NIR overtone regions as significance. On the other hand, PLS calibration model
resulted in higher predictive errors while the PLS-VIP variable selection captured variation from the
visible region between 664 nm and 884 nm. Using the UV-Vis data, PLS appeared to put attention
on only the highest absorbance region of the peak maximum absorbance. In contrast, SSOM model
highlighted the variation around the isosbestic spectral regions between the mixture components.
The drawback for the use of a mixture design to construct the calibration models, leading to wrong
interpretation of the important variables, was also discussed.
Start & End Page 
160 - 174
Received Date 
2019-01-14
Revised Date 
2019-09-11
Accepted Date 
2019-09-16
Full Text 
  Download
Keyword 
variable selection, multivariate calibration, partial least squares (PLS), elf organizing map (SOM), spectral data analysis
Volume 
Vol.47 No.1 (January 2020)
DOI 
SDGs
View:588 Download:399

Search in this journal


Document Search


Author Search

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

Popular Search






Chiang Mai Journal of Science

Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University
239 Huaykaew Road, Tumbol Suthep, Amphur Muang, Chiang Mai 50200 THAILAND
Tel: +6653-943-467




Faculty of Science,
Chiang Mai University




EMAIL
cmjs@cmu.ac.th




Copyrights © Since 2021 All Rights Reserved by Chiang Mai Journal of Science