Home
About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Journal Metrics
News & Actitivies
Annoucements
For Authors
Information for Authors
Submission System
Research Article Template & Guideline
Review Article Template & Guideline (h-index > 12)
Ethics
Ethics
For Reviewers
Journal Issue
Latest Issue
Paper In Press
Previous Issue
Special Collection
Journal Search
Author Search
Journal by Category
Applied Mathematics
Biochemistry
Biology
Chemistry
Environmental Science
Food Science
Genetics
Materials Science
Microbiology
Editorial
Molecular Biology
Physics
Undefined
Contact Us
Chiang Mai Journal of Science
Print ISSN: 0125-2526 | eISSN : 2465-3845
2,462
Articles
Q3 1.0
Impact Factor
Q2 1.6
CiteScore
7 days
Avg. First Decision
View / Download PDF
Outline
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI IN PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPT
FUNDING
REFERENCES
Figures and Tables
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1. Visual appearance of uncoated (control), 3% calcium chloride, 5% gum arabic and 3% calcium chloride + 5% gum arabic tarap fruits during storage at 10°C (85-90% RH) for 3 weeks.
Figure 10. Effect of different coating treatments on total phenolic content of tarap fruit stored at 10°C and 85-90% relative humidity for 3 storage weeks. Different letters in each treatment are significantly different at P≤0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 11. Effect of different coating treatments on FRAP activity of tarap fruit stored at 10°C and 85-90% relative humidity for 3 storage weeks. Different letters in each treatment are significantly different at P≤0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 2. Effect of different coating treatments on peel lightness (L*) of tarap fruit stored at 10°C and 85-90% relative humidity for 3 storage weeks. Different letters in each storage week are significantly different at P≤0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.